Fraud and Judgement Construction Within Canadian Courts.
It is falsely claimed by the Judiciary and Government, that the Canadian system of justice is open and transparent to the public. The Canadian judiciary is claimed to be equal in that judgements are being written, filed and available for anyone to read. Yet when there is proof of fraud, judgement construction and judges involvement with the witnesses the Prime Minister's office, the Justice Minister's office and the Chief Justice of Canada prevent a formal examination of evidence effectively concealing this corruption and obstructing proper justice. This means when reading a judgement it is not very clear what material evidence had been excluded by a judge to provide benefit or what objections had been over-ruled or how the judge was involved with the evidence or what evidence was fabricated and constructively manufactured.
The Canadian Judicial Council
Within their Internet web site have stated that "Judges must explain what they do". This claim is totally misleading and untrue. "Judges are not required to explain anything and they are not required to support their judgements with legitimate evidence". Appeals do not provide relief from this type of corruption as appeals do not provide the means to examine judges when there is proof of misconduct and fraud. Appeal Courts tend to support the lower courts findings.
The concealment of judges misconduct goes to the highest levels and the most senior levels of Canadian Judges and Canadian Government. Complaints against federally appointed judges are not open to any scrutiny and judges need not answer to anyone. Canadians are unable to formally ask questions when a judgement is not defendable by the judge or when there are serious questions relating to the application of evidence or judgement bias. This provides judges with believability even in cases where there is proof of fraud and permits easy concealment of fraud in order to support each other.
"To deliver selective facts is dishonest when the exclusion of fact can modify perception that can lead to inequality in law."
Judgements being a part of the public record fails to safeguard openness within the Canadian Judiciary including any claim of equality in justice or democracy. Judges decisions are not open to scrutiny.
Lack of Judicial Moral Standards - Judges Must Explain
Judges are not elected parliamentarians that are unable to change Canadian Society without reasonable explanation and acceptance from the majority of the Canadian public.
The Methods of Fraud Within Canadian Courts
The Canadian Government methods of obstruction are such that real evidence is not important. Government importance is given to what has been claimed by Canadian Judicial Council and evidence is not required to support the Council's allegations made. The Democracy of Canada uses unsupported claims made by the Canadian Judicial Council and its claim of independence to obstruct justice. The Canadian Judicial Council is a method of concealing corruption and fraud.
Although not recognized as a Canadian Court, significant is the Democracy of Canada recognizing the Canadian Judicial Council as a part of the Governments claim of judicial independence. The Democracy of Canada has deemed the independence of the Canadian Judicial Council and the issues relating to judges fraud and misconduct as the same. There is absolutely no credible place to present the proof of fraud and corruption in Canada today.
The Democracy of Canada created the Canadian Judicial Council in 1971, the Prime Minister federally appoints supreme court judges to his choosing. These are all political appointments, they are life long and not elected. The Democracy of Canada appoints inquiry members to the Canadian Judicial Council, yet the Prime Minister and Justice Minister claim they are unable to assist in calling any independent inquiry into the courts.
This is the key part of Government involvement within the Courts and the cover up. These are high level, hidden tactics of cover up having the Democracy of Canada immediately claim independence although evidence of misconduct and fraud has been presented. It is difficult to imagine that Canadian Courts are deemed independent to include "without scrutiny", "fraudulent" and "unable to ask a judge questions when there is fraud".
The evidence does not agree with the Canadian Judicial Council claims of trust. There is fraud. If the Canadian Government was truly independent it would ensure independent questions are asked. Independent questions are not asked. Obstruction of Justice goes to the highest levels of Government and Canadian Courts. Canadian Judicial Council bias is to support judges. The Canadian Government support is for the Canadian Judicial Council with its claim of independence. Evidence of misconduct is secondary for all these people, with the first priority to support each other. There is absolutely no independence of Canadian Courts having full participation of the Democracy of Canada, Justice Minister, Prime Minister and Chief Justice of Canada in suppressing corruption within the courts.
The Canadian Judicial Council is the method for this corruption to happen within the Canadian Courts without the public being informed. The Democracy of Canada failure to act or ask questions is significant, it has protected Supreme Court Judges ability to allege evidence that does not appear, deny witnesses, construct judgements and have dinner with witnesses.
Courts Corrupt Practices Intentionally Hidden by Government
A lack of scrutiny fails to permit the Canadian people to define the Canadian Government, Canadian Judges and Courts. While the crooked Canadian politicians and crooked Canadian Courts grow very much stronger and stronger, disturbing is they are able to do anything they please, it is easy for them to pick off Canadians one at a time or as a group.
The Courts, Democracy of Canada and their friends are gaining greater corrupt criminal strength each day. They become able to make fraudulent claims, hand down corrupt judgements and do unlawful acts without explanation. All seem to view themselves as above the law and above the ordinary Canadian. All senior government officials, who are in control of society, each have reasons not to permit evidence of Judicial Fraud to surface in Canada... because this would make the Courts accountable to ordinary people. This is no mistake for these people... Although mistake may be claimed once they are challenged. As in the past an "easily accepted" Government claim of "learning from this" may once again be used in order to gain criminal control over Canadians. Canadian democracy cannot move forward at this time.
The Canadian Justice Minister's allegations that judgements being a part of public record as a "safeguard to Canadian democracy" is a borderline on delusional thinking. Fraud is claimed.
Fraudulent Methods of Justice
The Prime Minister's and Chief Justice of Canada's claims of an independent court is to suppress open scrutiny and deprive the ability to question and present proof of misconduct and fraud.
|
