Canadian Judicial Council
B.C. Supreme Court Justice Richard Blair is an “Underhanded, Dishonest and Fraudulent Federally Appointed Canadian Judge” who was never asked to reasonably explain his allegations nor produce his alleged evidence in an effort to support his fraudulent claims.
Home Judicial Fraud RCMP Liars Exposed Canadian Judicial Council Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin Judicial Disclosure Law Judge Blair Problems Judgement Check List Part II of the Judges Act External Website Links Must Watch Video Democrocy Code of Canada Canadian Judicial Council Fraud Canadian Judicial Council Misconduct Contact
Facebook Share Twitter Share Email a Friend Text a Friend
Evidence 1 Evidence 2 Evidence 3 Evidence 4 Evidence 5 Evidence 6 Evidence 7 Evidence 8 Evidence 9 Evidence 10 Evidence 11 Evidence 12 Evidence 13 Evidence 14

Kamloops Judge Blair Allegations Failed to Appear Anywhere


Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin
Kamloops Supreme Court Justice Richard Blair
 
The Judgement Check List - Fraud within B.C. Supreme Court Judge Blair fraudulently alleged Mrs. Dianna Lynn Postnikoff was not at a doctors office, no evidence was presented to support his allegations. Health records prove the attandance and the doctor got paid. In addition Judge Blair fraudulently claimed that risks had been discussed, when they were NOT.

      Expert Checklist

Question: #1Within his affidavit did Dr. Philip Anthony White dispute Mrs. Dianna Lynn Postnikoff attendance at his office on September 20, 1994?
✅   No there is no reference in Dr. White's affidavit specifying whether or not Dianna Lynn Postnikoff attended at his office on September 20, 1994; ... John David McGreevy, Barrister & Solicitor.
Question: #2Within his affidavit did Dr. Philip Anthony White claim not to remember Mrs. Dianna Lynn Postnikoff attendance at his office on September 20, 1994?
✅  "No, there is no reference in Dr. White's affidavit claiming an inability to recall the attendance of Dianna Lynn Postnikoff at his office on September 20, 1994;" ... John David McGreevy, Barrister & Solicitor.
Question: #3Within his affidavit did Dr. Philip Anthony White dispute any submissions that had been presented by Mrs. Dianna Lynn Postnikoff within her affidavit?
✅   "No, the affidavit does not even refer to an affidavit presented by Mrs. Dianna Lynn Postnikoff; ...  John David McGreevy, Barrister & Solicitor.
Question: #4Within his affidavit did Dr. Philip Anthony White depose that he had discussed possible risks of a vasectomy with Mr. Paul Peter Postnikoff on September 30, 1994?
✅  "Dr. White states at clause number 6 that, "On that occasion, I explained the procedure to him as I always do in such cases." He does not fully explain what he did say (if anything) in terms of discussing possible risks. Further information is needed to determine what Dr. White suggests was discussed on September 30, 1994. Referral to Exhibit "B" does not provide any help in determining what was discussed;" ...  John David McGreevy, Barrister & Solicitor.
Question: #5If... Dr. Philip Anthony White's affidavit deposed that risks had been discussed on September 30, 1994, what were the risks claimed to be discussed on that day that appear within his affidavit?
✅  There is no reference in the affidavit to specific risks claimed to have been discussed on that day; ...  John David McGreevy, Barrister & Solicitor.
Question: #6 Within his affidavit did Dr. Philip Anthony White provide any documented evidence or signed disclosure forms that supported his claim that risk had been disclosed or discussed?
✅  There are no disclosure forms or other signed documents by Paul confirming that risks had been disclosed or discussed." ...  John David McGreevy, Barrister & Solicitor.
    Judgement Checklist
 
✅ Fraud. Dr. Philip White has it both ways, paid for the same attendance alleged not to have happened by Judge Blair.
✅ Fraud on an alleged consent.
✅ Fraud. Alleged experts failed to see the Plaintiff's evidence.
✅ Fraud. Court costs awarded for doctor benefit based upon unlawful claims.
✅ Canadian Judicial Council is Government's method of concealing  fraud and misconduct.
✅ Fraud. Unlawful claims appear on Government Internet sites
✅ Fraud. Violent public humiliation by Justice Blair with claims he knows to be untrue.
✅ Justice Blair not required to produce the alleged evidence nor explain his allegations. A Government accepted Canadian Precedent.
✅ Government refusal to provide the ability to present proof of fraud.
✅ The B.C. Court of Appeal makes Government accepted fraudulent claims.
✅ Removal of B.C. Supreme Court Judge Blair is not an issue for the courts.
✅ Judgement construction with a desired outcome.
✅ Judges dinner at the homes of doctor witnesses. Refusal to step aside.
✅ Democracy of Canada and Prime Minister claim independence from the Canadian courts although expert evidence of fraud is presented.
✅ Both law and evidence withheld by Judge Blair in order to provide benefit.
✅ B.C. Court of Appeal supports Judge Blair with fraudulent claims and refuses to hear an appeal.
Home | Judicial Fraud | RCMP Liars Exposed | Canadian Judicial Council | Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin | Judicial Disclosure Law | Judge Blair Problems | Judgement Check List | Part II of the Judges Act | External Website Links | Must Watch Video | Democrocy Code of Canada | Canadian Judicial Council Fraud | Canadian Judicial Council Misconduct | Contact | Facebook Share | Twitter Share | Email a Friend | Text a Friend

Evidence 1 | Evidence 2 | Evidence 3 | Evidence 4 | Evidence 5 | Evidence 6 | Evidence 7 | Evidence 8 | Evidence 9 | Evidence 10 | Evidence 11 | Evidence 12 | Evidence 13 | Evidence 14
Share, Download, Distribute, Copy, Social Media, Email, Talk and Comment on any Part of This Website.
Share.. Share.. Share.. with no restrictions.
If possible please reference website as your source.

Mobile Friendly Web Design By: Mr. Paul Postnikoff
https://canadianjudicialcourts.com
Email: info@canadianjudicialcourts.com
Canadian Judicial Council 2012 - 2025