B.C. Supreme Court Justice Richard Blair is an “Underhanded, Dishonest and Fraudulent Federally Appointed Canadian Judge” who was never asked to reasonably explain his allegations nor produce his alleged evidence in an effort to support his fraudulent claims.
| A Standard Set For The Courts. |
| Justice Blair's judgement is based upon his violent impulse and speculation and not of the facts before the court and Justice Blair's allegations are not supported. What had been prior law on consent, battery the standards of disclosure, access to a fair trial and the quality of expert evidence are seriously modified or failed to appear in judgement. The B.C. Court of Appeal DENIED and failed to overturn this judgement. |
| Request For a Trial is Denied |
| A request for a trial and cross-examination was made, Justice Blair rejected a request for trial and ability to cross examine. Justice Blair ordered a closed court room. A precedent when facts are needed or there has been fraud within a closed court room. Expert evidence was presented to the Prime Minister that clearly stated that facts had been needed in order to support Justice Blair's allegations. |
| There is more... Justice Blair refused to step aside from his involvement with evidence when he attended dinner parties at the homes of witnesses, he pointed and yelled "his friendships with witnesses would not have any effect on his judgement". |
| Dr. Philip Anthony White was paid for the same attendance that Justice Blair claimed to never happen. There was absolutely no evidence submitted that disputed this attendance other that Judge Blair's allegations. This was done in order to constructively eliminate truthful evidence. Justice Blair is the sole person alleging this attendance never happened, Nothing supported his claim. Judgement Construction and Judicial Fraud are both claimed. |
| Justice Blair alleged that Dr. Philip Anthony White deposed in his affidavit that he discussed risk on September 30, 1994, although this allegation never appeared within any evidence as alleged by Justice Blair. Expert evidence was presented to the Prime Minister and Chief Justice of Canada Beverley McLachlin proving that claims made by Justice Blair failed to appear within the evidence. |
| Deceptive Claims of Open Court |
| It is claimed by the Judiciary and Government, that the Canadian system of justice is open and transparent to the public. The Canadian judiciary is claimed to be equal in that judgements are being written, filed and available for anyone to read. Yet when there is proof of fraud and judges dinner parties with the expert witnesses the Prime Minister's office, the Justice Minister's office and the Chief Justice of Canada Beverley McLachlin prevent a formal examination of evidence effectively concealing this corruption and obstruction of justice. This means when reading a judgement it is not very clear what material evidence had been excluded by a judge to provide benefit or what objections had been over-ruled or how the judge was involved with the evidence or what evidence was fabricated by the Judge or constructively manufactured. |
There Is fraud Within This Judgement. |
| The Canadian Judicial Council within their Internet web site state that "Judges must explain what they do". This claim is absolutely misleading and untrue. "Judges are not required to explain anything and they are not required to support their judgements with legitimate evidence". Appeals do not provide relief from this type of corruption as appeals do not provide the means to examine judges when there is proof of misconduct and fraud. Appeal Courts tend to support the lower courts findings. The Plaintiff was prevented the ability to examine Judge Blair and openly present proof of judicial fraud. |
A Violent and Very Public Humiliation of an Entire Family |
| The concealment of judges misconduct goes to the highest levels and the most senior levels of Canadian Judges. Canadians are unable to formally ask questions when there are serious questions relating to the application of evidence or judgement fraud as in this case. This provides judges with believability even in cases where there is proof of fraud and permits easy concealment of fraud in order to support each other. This family has been very violently assaulted and very publicly humiliated by Judge Richard Blair without an ability to defend against fraud. Judge Blair knows he lied and had no basis for his allegations. |
